October 12 – A growing number of large cities are considering congestion pricing, a policy that charges drivers a fee
October 12 – A growing number of large cities are considering congestion pricing, a policy that charges drivers a fee to enter the busiest urban zones during peak hours. Supporters argue that the measure can reduce traffic delays, cut fuel consumption, and improve air quality by discouraging unnecessary car trips. The approach has gained traction as municipalities face rising health costs linked to pollution and struggle to meet climate targets. In some places, officials also frame congestion pricing as a way to make street space more efficient by prioritizing buses and delivery vehicles that keep city centers functioning.
Critics, however, warn that congestion fees may place a disproportionate burden on lower-income commuters who cannot easily change their schedules or switch to public transport. Small retailers also worry that fewer drivers in central districts could reduce footfall, particularly for businesses that rely on short visits. Others question whether the policy simply shifts traffic to surrounding neighborhoods, creating new bottlenecks and exposing different communities to exhaust. Proponents counter that outcomes depend on local design choices—such as where charging boundaries are drawn, how fees vary by time of day, and whether exemptions are tightly targeted rather than broadly granted.
Dr. Elena Morozova, an urban policy researcher at the Metropolitan Institute, notes, “Congestion pricing works best when cities earmark the proceeds for reliable transit, safer walking routes, and targeted discounts for vulnerable groups.” She adds that without complementary improvements—such as expanded bus lanes and frequent service—fees alone may change driver behavior in unpredictable ways. Some motorists may absorb the cost, while others reroute onto residential streets, undermining both congestion relief and public acceptance. For city leaders, the central challenge is therefore not only technical implementation but also building trust that the policy will be fair, transparent, and responsive to data as conditions evolve.
Trả lời cho các câu 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 dưới đây:
Which of the following statements is NOT supported by the passage?
Đáp án đúng là: C
Đang cập nhật ...
Đáp án cần chọn là: C
What is the meaning of the word “earmark” in the sentence above?
Đáp án đúng là: A
Đang cập nhật ...
Đáp án cần chọn là: A
Which of the following best paraphrases the sentence “For city leaders, the central challenge is therefore not only technical implementation but also building trust that the policy will be fair, transparent, and responsive to data as conditions evolve.”
Đáp án đúng là: A
Đang cập nhật ...
Đáp án cần chọn là: A
Which design choice discussed in the passage focuses on restricting eligibility for fee exemptions?
Đáp án đúng là: A
Đang cập nhật ...
Đáp án cần chọn là: A
It can be inferred from the passage that congestion pricing is most likely to achieve its intended goals when ____________.
Đáp án đúng là: A
Đang cập nhật ...
Đáp án cần chọn là: A
Quảng cáo
Group 2K8 ôn Thi ĐGNL & ĐGTD Miễn Phí
>> 2K8 Chú ý! Lộ Trình Sun 2026 - 3IN1 - 1 lộ trình ôn 3 kì thi (Luyện thi 26+ TN THPT, 90+ ĐGNL HN, 900+ ĐGNL HCM, 70+ ĐGTD - Click xem ngay) tại Tuyensinh247.com.Đầy đủ theo 3 đầu sách, Thầy Cô giáo giỏi, luyện thi theo 3 giai đoạn: Nền tảng lớp 12, Luyện thi chuyên sâu, Luyện đề đủ dạng đáp ứng mọi kì thi.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hỗ trợ - Hướng dẫn
-
024.7300.7989
-
1800.6947
(Thời gian hỗ trợ từ 7h đến 22h)
Email: lienhe@tuyensinh247.com
