Tel: 024.7300.7989 - Phone: 1800.6947 (Thời gian hỗ trợ từ 7h đến 22h)

Thi thử toàn quốc cuối HK1 lớp 10, 11, 12 tất cả các môn - Trạm số 1 - Ngày 20-21/12/2025 Xem chi tiết
Giỏ hàng của tôi

Dạng bài Đọc hiểu lớp 12

Lưu ý: Chức năng này hiện không còn dùng nữa, vui lòng chọn các khóa học để xem các bài giảng hoặc làm đề thi online!

Bài 236:

Read the following passage and mark the letter A, B, C, or D on year answer sheet to indicate the correct answer to each of the questions. 

With a UPS receiver, you need never be lost again. Whether you are driving in a new city or climbing a mountain path, you can use UPS (Global Positioning System) to find out exactly where you are. In recent years, the development of very small and inexpensive receivers has made possible all kinds of other uses. Many cars now come equipped with GPS receivers and computerized maps to show where you are. Parents or pet owners put receivers on their children or their dogs so they cannot be lost. However, what makes GPS so usefill-the way it allows us to keep track of people and things-could also make it dangerous if it is used for the wrong purposes. Some organizations that are concerned about rights to privacy have argued that there should be limits to who can use GPS and for what purpose. In the United States, several cases have been brought to court to question the right of the government or private companies to track people "without their knowledge".

One important case came up in 2003 before the Supreme Court in the state of Washington. Under American laws protecting the right to privacy, the government or the police are not allowed to investigate a person's private life if there is no evidence that he or she has committed a crime. In the Washington case, the police had wanted to learn more about the habits of a man they suspected, so they hid a GPS receiver in his car. Lawyers for the suspect argued that this was illegal because it went against his right to privacy. The Washington Supreme Court agreed. In their view, hiding a GPS receiver in a car was like putting an invisible police officer in the back seat This was acceptable practice only if the police already had evidence that the suspect had been involved in a crime and if they had permission from a judge. Otherwise, it could not be used.

In 2005, another interesting case involving GPS was brought before the Supreme Court in Connecticut. This case involved a rental car company that decided to use GPS technology to prevent customers from driving their cars too fast. They hid GPS receivers in all their rental cars, which allowed them to know where each car was at any time. The receivers could also be used to calculate the speed at which a car moved from one place to another. If the car was driven faster than 80 miles per hour (120 km hour), the driver was charged an extra $150. Though the rental contract did mention GPS in very small print, customers were not told about it or about the extra charge. One customer who was charged 450 for speeding three times became very angry, and he decided to bring the rental company to court. In his view, the rental company had used GPS to spy on him illegally and the charges were unfair. The Connecticut Supreme Court agreed that this use of GPS was not acceptable and told the rental company to return the 450. According to the judges, the rental company should have informed the driver about the existence of a GPS receiver in the car and about the speeding charge.

Câu hỏi số 1:

The passage is written to__________.

Câu hỏi số 2:

GPS is used to locate______________.

Câu hỏi số 3:

According to the passage, the wrong use of GPS is______________.

Câu hỏi số 4:

Some of organizations are concerned that the use of GPS in some cases may violate_____________.

Câu hỏi số 5:

The phrase "without their knowledge" means_______________.

Câu hỏi số 6:

The word "case" in the first line of the second paragraph refers to______________.

Câu hỏi số 7:

According to the passage, the word "privacy" can be used interchangeably with____________.

Câu hỏi số 8:

According te the Washington Supreme Court, hiding a GPS receiver to investigate a person's habit without prior evidence that he had been involved in a crime is___________.

Câu hỏi số 9:

The Connecticut Supreme Court thought that hiding a GPS receiver in the car without the customer's knowing it is_________________.

Câu hỏi số 10:

The word "they" in line 4 of the last paragraph refers to_____________.

Còn hàng ngàn bài tập hay, nhanh tay thử sức!

>> Luyện thi tốt nghiệp THPT và Đại học, mọi lúc, mọi nơi tất cả các môn cùng các thầy cô giỏi nổi tiếng, dạy hay dễ hiểu trên Tuyensinh247.com. 

Hỗ trợ - Hướng dẫn

  • 024.7300.7989
  • 1800.6947 free

(Thời gian hỗ trợ từ 7h đến 22h)
Email: lienhe@tuyensinh247.com